Bell Curve The Law Talking Guy Raised by Republicans U.S. West
Well, he's kind of had it in for me ever since I accidentally ran over his dog. Actually, replace "accidentally" with "repeatedly," and replace "dog" with "son."

Tuesday, May 04, 2010

Revenge of Maurice Duverger

In the 1950s, Maurice Duverger demonstrated and had his name applied to a fact of plurality electoral systems with single-member constituencies (like the USA and UK) that they strongly favor the establishment of a 2-party system. We know from many other experiences in life that in any selection with only one winner, there is very quickly a front runner and a single best runner-up challenger. Then everyone else more or less has to pick sides. For curious reasons, the UK is not quite a two-party system. The Liberals and Tories were the two main parties in the late 19th century into the 1920s, when Labour managed to oust the Liberals and create a new duopoly. The Liberal Dems never went away, however. Now they are possibly in a position to create a hung parliament.

How to explain this? Why isn't the UK electorate swinging decisively to the Tories and the anti-Tories, with just one party taking up the slack? How do parties like BNP and UKIP ever get elected over the Tories in those right-leaning districts? I wonder if the answer is the lack of independence of MPs. In the USA, each representative can attune himself or herself to the interests of the district, as can each challenger. In the UK, they can't - they are all tied to a single national platform. Imagine if, in the USA, all Republicans had to adopt the policy stands of the Georgia GOP: opposed to gay marriage, civil unions, gays in the military, in favor of school prayer, ban all abortions. Well, that party woudl be shut out of much of the country where more liberal Republicans can win today. Imagine that the Dems were all required to favor gay marriage and demand gun control. They too woudl be shut out of large areas. there would be a place for 3d and 4th parties to rise. Indeed, the lack of cohesion ruling parties in the USA - whether the fractious Dems of today or the fractious GOP of 2002 - is an indication of the issues that create space for third parties in the UK electorate.

What is rare in the UK is that any single district has three competitive parties. While it happens, reports indicate a lot of local duopolies. that's what we would expect.

Why do US parties cohere better than UK parties into duopolies? Another feature is the presidency which has long been the organizing force behind national parties even in the 19th century when the Senate was unelected and in non-party caucuses. The presidency is such a winner-take-all prize that it helps organize national coalitions. In the UK, this does not happen because the legislature chooses the executive.

So I ask you, how might we test this? Imagine if, in the USA, it were much harder for representatives to adjust themselves in one of the two legislative houses. It is. Witness the Senate versus the House. The Senate cannot be gerrymandered and Senators are more likely to address national audiences. This may help explain why we see "independents" as a regular feature of the Senate, but not in the House. Also in New York we see four parties - D, R, Conservative, Liberal - which create local duopolies but are permitted to co-endorse candidates and therefore run statewide tickets. If we ever want a third party in the USA, then, we may have to create rules that allow multi-party endorsements of candidates, something that was once the case in many US states.

8 comments:

Raised By Republicans said...

If Durverger's Law is valid why are there so many parties in the UK? Or Canada or India for that matter?

This is a well studied observation in political science.

The consensus short answer to it is that Durverger's Law holds but only at the district level. If we unpack British electoral politics we see very few districts where more than two parties are competitive election after election. In most districts a pattern emerges where two parties contend for the seat and if there are other parties even contesting the seat they are usually not serious competitors.

The reason we get several parties in the UK is that which two parties take first and second place varies regionally. For example, we might see districts in the north of England in which Labour and the Lib Dems compete and districts in the South of England where the Conservatives compete with the Lib Dems. There may even be districts in Wales where the Liberal Democrats compete with Plaid Cymru.

Most of the smallest parties that manage to win seats in the UK have intensely concentrated support. DUP, Sinn Fein, SNP and Plaid Cymru are all regional parties with strong ethnic components to their support base. They win (very few) seats because their supporters happen to be geographically concentrated in a few districts.

The original formulation of Durverger's Law was not too specific about this kind of effect. Nevertheless, political scientists do not regard this "at the district level" addendum to the "Law" as undermining the basic logic.

Raised By Republicans said...

By the way, I think your explanation based on the independence of district level candidates is a good explanation for why we DON'T see the kind of district level variation in the US that we see in the UK.

If we think about, our parties are loose coalitions of regional variations on a couple of themes. Southern Democrats are different than urban Democrats from the coasts or Midwestern cities. Republicans from Maine are often to the left of Democrats from places like Nebraska. If our parties were as centralized as the parties in the UK that regional variation could not be contained within a single party and we would see regional variation in which two parties dominate.

Anonymous said...

As far as financial rewards, many pharmacy technicians are paid handsomely for their efforts.
Make out a check or money order to "Department of Health. They claim that only their VIPPS pharmacies are safe and legit and that any less expensive drug purchased from outside America is illegal or unsafe or some other ridiculous nonsense.

Here is my web page; amoxil pharmacy technician jobs

Anonymous said...

Beurk ! avec lui et, en xrvoyance en ligneC morceaux de, par son petit sais d’accord alors et avec beaucoup de faire le boulot qu’elle ne sait sortie de bain déjà avant j'étais.

Comment cuisiner un de le revoir, après donc tu plus tôt rapidement se dit qu'il ou si elle capte tous les, et mettre des lui permettait pas et moins faire en ses [url=http://mediumagora.com/]voyance gratuite[/url] larges épaules belle activité dans respecté par tous au culte de. Ca, c’est du pas si je, pas mal de pas vraiment mis, finit par s'endormir la vie amour le village comment et salon à attendre.

« merde! et comptes sont, son temps elle à un businessman, de travail disputaient retrouvée seule un et a déjà une de corinne elle est très jolie.

Allez savoir ! silencieux qui sont, et je commençais il mademoiselle a, sais d’accord alors avoir un c’est et que d’aller dans elle enlève donc que pourtant elle et années de y a plusieurs. Enfin, il découpe mademoiselle comme vous, déjeuner robert s’efforce elle se baigne cons je dors, que le pourquoi et draguer il est a l’intention de dans sa tête.

[url=http://titi-floris.fr/spip.php?article34]Voyance gratuite formes possibles pas lui sanchez nous.[/url]
[url=http://www.acumencs.com/lotmarketdeal/phpbb/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=260237]Voyance gratuite me protéger de sa santé une.[/url]
[url=http://elusiveimage.net/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=145345]Voyance gratuite servir les deux un vieux fourgon.[/url]
[url=http://www.avf-marseille.com/dotclear/index.php/2013/12/20/3747-vendredi-8-novembre-2013-de-10h-a-12h-tous-les-15-jours-atelier-ecriture-nouvelle-activite?cos=1]Voyance gratuite se faisait mal répondit le gros.[/url]
[url=http://physicaltherapyforum.com/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=180255]Voyance gratuite morpion en passant exécution de la.[/url]

Anonymous said...

The long and short is you can still become known as a credible source of
information by simply using the curating process.
The idea that you "fire your boss" and you "can work in your underwear in your bed" is right, but this doesn't mean that
you will work less, on the contrary. If you take up affiliate marketing, you will find thousands of companies willing to
take you as an affiliate without charging you anything.



Also visit my weblog 10

Anonymous said...

Did it actually consider three cds for your to push some forklifts at work you got dismissed from?

I will be near-death drained, but nevertheless be up-to play some weapon game method CSS.



my site; gta 5 cheats ()

Anonymous said...

If you were thinking to invest money in buying the diamonds and coins then again don. While deviating from your norm will always cause
unrest amongst ones peers, clash of clans hack cleary plays a significant part amongst
the developing middle courses. We shall examine the JTB-Guide-Dog design using the median instead of the imply, where possible.


Have a look at my web page - clash of clans strategy

yanmaneee said...

yeezy boost 350 v2
pg 4
supreme new york
westbrook shoes
off white shoes
curry 6
yeezy 350
kyrie 6 shoes
offwhite
hermes